Latest AI News

Electronic Arts is reportedly close to a $50 billion deal to go private, potentially becoming one of the largest leveraged buyouts in history. The transaction would likely involve a consortium of private equity firms, though specific investors remain unnamed. Analysts suggest EA may be seeking freedom from public market pressures, greater flexibility for long-term investments, and restructuring opportunities without shareholder oversight. This potential move aligns with broader consolidation trends in the gaming and technology sectors. While no official confirmation has been made, the deal could significantly impact the future of the video game industry.

Anthropic plans to triple its international workforce in 2025 due to soaring demand for Claude AI models globally. With 80% of Claude usage coming from outside the US, the company is expanding rapidly in markets like South Korea, Australia, and Singapore. New offices, including one in Tokyo, will support regional operations. The company maintains an 80% retention rate and benefits from strategic partnerships with AWS and Google.

Meta is exploring a partnership with Google's Gemini AI to enhance its ad targeting capabilities. The company has already signed a six-year, $10 billion deal with Google Cloud for infrastructure services. This collaboration reflects Meta's strategy to leverage external AI solutions to improve advertising effectiveness, highlighting the growing importance of AI in digital advertising. The partnership also intensifies competition among tech giants for market dominance in cloud services and ad technology.

A federal judge approved a $1.5 billion settlement between Anthropic and authors who claimed their books were illegally used to train the Claude AI. Authors will receive about $3,000 per book used in past training. Judge Alsup ensured all eligible authors would be notified properly. The settlement follows his earlier ruling that while AI training on copyrighted works isn't inherently illegal, Anthropic had wrongfully obtained books through piracy. The case establishes a precedent for intellectual property rights in AI development, with affected authors needing to either accept compensation or opt out to preserve future legal options.